Final paper description & conference abstract

Saturday, April 19th, 2014 by dparker90

Hi all, below I’ve posted a description of my final paper, which doubles as my 250-word abstract submission for the International Conference on Romanticism. If you happen to read this before Monday, please let me know if there are any improvements I can make. This project is my first attempt to bring a media archeological approach to the study of Romantic poetry. So far my fellow Romanticists have told me that they don’t know what I mean by “media;” in the context of this paper, I think I’m trying to align it with poetic form, genre conventions, and publishing practices. Do you think those things count as media? Anyway, here you go: 

“4000 lines of one bare circumstance:” Endymion’s Mediated Poetics

 From its conception, John Keats’s Endymion (1818) was shaped by the formal constraints of its poetic medium. When publishers Taylor and Hessey contacted Keats about producing a work of epic length and scope, the poet reflected that it would be “a trial of my Powers of Imagination and chiefly of my invention which is a rare thing indeed – by which I must make 4000 lines of one bare circumstance and fill them with Poetry.” Keats envisioned Endymion’s formal medium as preceding and existing independent of its poetic content. Taking its cue from Keats’s reflections on the poem, my paper reads Endymion as enacting a critique of Romantic media by drawing attention to its own poetic medium through its subversion of both the heroic couplet and the epic genre. In the same way that media theorist Friedrich Kittler reads Goethe’s “Wandering Nightsong” as a discourse on the constraints of German discourse networks, I argue that Endymion comments on the constraints of poetic media precisely by pushing those formal constraints to their limits, a claim that can be confirmed both by analyzing the poem’s form and by examining the critical response in journals such as The British Critic. The poem’s clunky couplets, off-kilter rhymes, and other formal elements that critics tend to chalk up to Keats’s youth and inexperience in fact perform a sophisticated critique of the rules they break. At the same time, the poem’s frequent code switching from epic to “poetic romance” – in the proem of Book II, for example – disorders the conventions of these genres and readers’ expectations for them. In what is often read simply as “bad” poetry, Endymion disrupts communication channels and exposes the mediated reality of Romantic discourse.

Advertisements

6 comments on “Final paper description & conference abstract

  1. This sounds like a very interesting project. I, too, struggle with what defines “media,” so I’m not sure I’ll be much help, but I think connecting it to Kittler’s work on Goethe’s poem is a very smart move, and helps justify your usage of the term “media” as applying to poetic form, genre conventions, and publishing practices…not just “media” in the general sense of books, photography, film, computers, video games, etcetera. I think the notion of “Romantic media” is also intriguing….kind of forcing us to realize that “media” is not just a 20th-21st century matter.

    • dparker90 says:

      Thanks for your comment, Sammy! I keep finding the word “media” popping up in 18th-c writings, so I think you’re right that it’s definitely not just a 20th-century phenomenon.

  2. Lori Emerson says:

    Deven, here’s another book you might want to look at – I admit I haven’t had time to read it myself but Gitelman is fantastic: http://www.amazon.com/New-Media-1740-1915-Transition/dp/0262572281

    • dparker90 says:

      Thank you for the recommendation, Lori! Of course it’s checked out at Norlin, but I’m trying to get my hands on a copy.

  3. Deven, I don’t really have any useful criticism in terms of applying pressure to your argument because to me it sounds very agreeable and fascinating. I take your argument as altering how we understand canon formation–was Keats’s poem treated as noise?

    At any rate, I’m glad that you’re blending media studies with literary studies, thereby shaking up the traditional way to do the latter. I think I’m mainly writing to say that I am very much excited to hear your presentation! 🙂

    • dparker90 says:

      Thanks for your feedback, Brandon! I like your idea of bad poetry as noise, and I’m hoping to explore this notion further. I can’t find any evidence that Keats’s work was every described as noisy, but my paper for Nicole’s class on Della Cruscan affect will treat newspaper poetry that was distinctly labeled “noise.” The term itself was definitely in use.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: